Other than insurance (I already have a request in to my agent for what the change would be), give me a reason why I should not replace my perfectly running and well modified (for me) 2006 Sprint 1050 ABS with 18,500 miles with a 2008 ZX-14 with 3000 miles?
I'm ready to actually push the sale of the Sprint, dropping the price and selling the extra parts separately, or trading it in for this ZX-14.
I loved the Busa I rode for 2 days, I love my buddys' K1300S (lot's of seat time on both), and really enjoyed the refined feel of the ZX-14 I rode (although it was in the rain). Ergos were also fine, altho the one I'm looking at already has bar risers installed (otherwise stock).
I love my Sprint, but new bikeitis strikes and I've never had a superbike, despite a serious love (and awe) of the effortless power these bikes have. While I've never really pushed the K1300 or ZX-14 I've ridden, I did push the Busa in some high and slow speed turns, and the handling doesn't seem all that far off the Sprint with stock suspension (from what I can remember). The ZX-14 suspension is fully adjustable like the Busa.
Any reason I shouldn't do this? It would be for my 46 mile highway/tollway commute, trips back and forth from Chicago to Michigan (200 miles each way, 7-10 trips a summer), other touring and dedicated day rides. I live in Illinois. I'll still have my 2003 Tuono. Give me any subjective or objective reason I should keep the Sprint, no matter how ridiculous. I'm thinking ride over to the shop with my title in hand and some cash and make them an offer for trade.
THanks,
- Dan