Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR  (Read 3067 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Black Hills

  • Member
  • Posts: 737
  • Motorcycles: KTM 1190 Adventure R, KTM300xcw
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #60 on: December 24, 2013, 09:31:36 PM »
I don't have a lot of miles on a FJR, but do ride one occasionally. I think it handles far better than its numbers would suggest. I see no need for a 6th gear, and the brakes are fantastic. If I was going to go across the country and stay on the pavement it would be my first choice.

Online 2RR2NV

  • Member
  • Posts: 203
  • if you're gonna go, go with a smile!!
  • Motorcycles: 2012 ZX-14R "the Flaming Hulk"
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #61 on: December 24, 2013, 09:39:58 PM »
I would have to agree that the FJR is excellent for what it was built for. sure, I missed a 6th when i first got it, but after riding it the lil i did, 5th was dead nuts on the spot. no complaints about that. Don't regret selling it though. Wife rode on it and was NOT a happy camper. also, it just didn't do anything for me - no smiles after the first few thou. I tried to love it or even "like" it. Nope. No success. Storage was "nice" to have, but i just didn't use it much. I probably could have left those off for 95% of my riding. heck, my current ride has been used for more fast food deliveries for my family of 4 than the FJR and I've only put 300+ miles on it.
previous rides: 2011 GSXR750, 2007 FJR1300, 2004 GSXR750, 2002 Busa, 2002 VFR800, 1992 Honda Nighthawk CB750

Offline Royal Tiger

  • Member
  • Posts: 573
  • Deutsche Rüstungs-Abteilung
  • Motorcycles: See Signature
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #62 on: December 24, 2013, 11:56:29 PM »
And on that note, no one, EVEN BMW, has my bank account on stand by.  The only ST bike under 550 and over 100hp is the Ninja 1000 and it's OK, but certainly not the top of the segment.  The Futura, Sprint, ST4s, 800 Interceptor, are all gone.  The VFR1200 is fugly, over priced, and heavy.  I might have to go with a K1300S, but the bags are marginal and it's just a tick over 550.  I've read as high as 565.

You are going to have a tough time meeting those specs unless you are riding solo. Most ST bikes are made for a little passenger comfort over the long haul and that equals weight. Sure you can do it on a lighter bike like a Sprint ST or a VFR, but you give up a little bit in passenger comfort.

When you say "top of the segment", what qualifiers are you using? If you're talking electronic add-ons, with those come weight penalties. I've ridden with plenty of guys on this forum and you would be amazed at what can be done on an FJR or C14 without all the electronic gee wiz stuff stuff on it. Plenty of these guys can leave most in the dust if they choose. I'm a big fan of technology, but for some reason other than ABS, I just don't feel a huge need for it on a bike.

If you need bigger bags, you're packing too much shit. :bigsmile: As for the bags being water proof on the FJR, I can tell you for a fact they are and haven't heard of anyone having any real problems with them.

My R1200ST is about 510lbs wet, shaft drive, 110HP, and great 2 up, with awesome bags.  Problem is if something ever happens to it, they haven't made them since 2007.  The new RT is 603lbs wet.  I also agree the Ninja 1000 seems more of a solo bike as does the F800ST/GT.
~Dan

2013 Yamaha XT250 * 2012 Kawasaki Ninja 250 * 2007 BMW G650X XChallenge * 2005 BMW R1200ST * 2003 Yamaha PW80

Online chornbe

  • Member
  • Posts: 1154
  • Burdened with glorious purpose.
    • The Pace Motorcycle Podcast
  • Motorcycles: Slowing down
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #63 on: December 25, 2013, 05:03:49 AM »
My R1200ST is about 510lbs wet, shaft drive, 110HP, and great 2 up, with awesome bags.  Problem is if something ever happens to it, they haven't made them since 2007.  The new RT is 603lbs wet.  I also agree the Ninja 1000 seems more of a solo bike as does the F800ST/GT.

The F800 ST was on my very, very short list, but it's not awesome for passengers. Now that I'm 99% solo riding again - as Liz rides her own and usually is kicking my ass doing so - it's back on the someday-list. My 12 year daughter would likely be the only passenger, and unless she has some major growth spurt, she's probably going to be in the 5'2" - 5'4" range like her sister. Pretty much perfectly sized for the ST. Well, I guess now it would be the GT. I haven't sat on a GT yet, but the ST felt like it was built for me.  :inlove:
this signature on hold pending review

Offline SuperHans

  • Member
  • Posts: 536
  • Motorcycles: WarPig
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #64 on: December 25, 2013, 06:45:40 AM »
And on that note, no one, EVEN BMW, has my bank account on stand by.  The only ST bike under 550 and over 100hp is the Ninja 1000 and it's OK, but certainly not the top of the segment.  The Futura, Sprint, ST4s, 800 Interceptor, are all gone.  The VFR1200 is fugly, over priced, and heavy.  I might have to go with a K1300S, but the bags are marginal and it's just a tick over 550.  I've read as high as 565.

You are going to have a tough time meeting those specs unless you are riding solo. Most ST bikes are made for a little passenger comfort over the long haul and that equals weight. Sure you can do it on a lighter bike like a Sprint ST or a VFR, but you give up a little bit in passenger comfort.

When you say "top of the segment", what qualifiers are you using? If you're talking electronic add-ons, with those come weight penalties. I've ridden with plenty of guys on this forum and you would be amazed at what can be done on an FJR or C14 without all the electronic gee wiz stuff stuff on it. Plenty of these guys can leave most in the dust if they choose. I'm a big fan of technology, but for some reason other than ABS, I just don't feel a huge need for it on a bike.

If you need bigger bags, you're packing too much shit. :bigsmile: As for the bags being water proof on the FJR, I can tell you for a fact they are and haven't heard of anyone having any real problems with them.

My R1200ST is about 510lbs wet, shaft drive, 110HP, and great 2 up, with awesome bags.  Problem is if something ever happens to it, they haven't made them since 2007.  The new RT is 603lbs wet.  I also agree the Ninja 1000 seems more of a solo bike as does the F800ST/GT.

The R1200RT was a very nice bike that hit that sweet spot, but for whatever reason it never caught on and had a short production run.

Offline Royal Tiger

  • Member
  • Posts: 573
  • Deutsche Rüstungs-Abteilung
  • Motorcycles: See Signature
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #65 on: December 25, 2013, 12:36:04 PM »
It cost almost as much as the RT and the "traditional" BMW buyer is more of a RT type person.  The ST look's were also polarizing.  I'd kill for a brand new wethead version.
~Dan

2013 Yamaha XT250 * 2012 Kawasaki Ninja 250 * 2007 BMW G650X XChallenge * 2005 BMW R1200ST * 2003 Yamaha PW80

Offline FireBlade

  • Member
  • Posts: 14
  • Motorcycles: A Few
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #66 on: December 25, 2013, 03:25:50 PM »
Those FJR do you give you the best bang for the buck and they look good doing it.  :)

Offline FJRider

  • Member
  • Posts: 34
  • Deju Vu All Over Again
    • Zombo
  • Motorcycles: 2009 FJR1300AE, 2014 FZ-09
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #67 on: December 31, 2013, 08:53:34 AM »
My FJR is comfortable, fast, and reliable. I have the AE and I love it. Especially when stuck in traffic or when carving up the corners. The only down side is low speed maneuvers which, with practice, you can compensate for the lack of clutch with the rear brake.
A man is only as old as the woman he feels - Groucho Marx

Online BMW-K

  • Member
  • Posts: 291
  • When in doubt, roll on the throttle.
  • Motorcycles: F800GS, Monster EVO, WR250R
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #68 on: January 01, 2014, 09:43:43 AM »
I love reading threads like this.  It helps me to remember that there is no perfect bike.  The FJR may come close in some ways for many people and be an utter FAIL for others. 

Personally while I love the concept of the FJR it's let down by the weight and the I4 motor.  I just plain like a lighter bike and the I4 motor leaves me very non-plussed. 

A bike I truly wanted to love was the Futura.  I loved everything about the bike except…it didn't come with ABS.  That's a deal breaker for me.  Well, that and no dealer anywhere near me…

IMO, LIGHT is still the #1 thing we, the general ST community, continue to pine away for.  Light weight.  It's just plain hard to argue with light weight. 
Lo and behold, we ride!

IBA #:  20880

Offline Orson

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 63
  • Motorcycles: 2000 Aprilia Mille, 2002 Moto Guzzi Le Mans, 2004 Triumph Thruxton
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #69 on: January 01, 2014, 11:34:46 AM »
Ideally, you would want to mate a shaft drive to a V-twin power plant to attain sport touring Nirvana.

Online Prubert

  • Member
  • Posts: 53
  • I'm HUGE in Japan
  • Motorcycles: FJR1300a
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #70 on: January 01, 2014, 12:51:17 PM »
Ideally, you would want to mate a shaft drive to a V-twin power plant to attain sport touring Nirvana.

Too bad they don't make anything good like this.
Prubert
'07 FJR1300a
Waukesha, WI

Online mxvet57

  • Member
  • Posts: 2567
  • Loud horns save lives
  • Motorcycles: 04 FJR, 06 Speed triple, 88 EX500, 05 YZ250, 91 KX500
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #71 on: January 01, 2014, 01:10:23 PM »
Ideally, you would want to mate a shaft drive to a V-twin power plant to attain sport touring Nirvana.

Too bad they don't make anything good like this.


You should bring this up at the next "company" meeting.
lAt the risk of encouraging him, I agree with Cookie.   "Bomber"

Every day is my birthday

Online BMW-K

  • Member
  • Posts: 291
  • When in doubt, roll on the throttle.
  • Motorcycles: F800GS, Monster EVO, WR250R
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #72 on: January 04, 2014, 09:59:13 AM »
Ideally, you would want to mate a shaft drive to a V-twin power plant to attain sport touring Nirvana.

Too bad they don't make anything good like this.

They did.  It was called the Suzuki VX800.  Remember that piece of awesomeness? 
Lo and behold, we ride!

IBA #:  20880

Online Cablebandit

  • Member
  • Posts: 1824
  • Pig Pilot
    • https://www.facebook.com/TheCablebandits
  • Motorcycles: A Blue One
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #73 on: January 04, 2014, 10:41:14 AM »
Ideally, you would want to mate a shaft drive to a V-twin power plant to attain sport touring Nirvana.


Too bad they don't make anything good like this.


They did.  It was called the Suzuki VX800.  Remember that piece of awesomeness?


visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Right over the head.

Online rgbeard

  • Member
  • Posts: 206
  • Motorcycles: Triumph Trophy 1200 and Triumph Speed Triple
Re: 5 out of 6 IBR top finishers rode an FJR
« Reply #74 on: January 04, 2014, 01:07:55 PM »
In the nearly 40 years of making Goldwings, Honda has never put in a 6th gear.

5 has fit them just fine.   I used to think it was an oversight.  But having put over 100k miles on various models, I have to say, they did, and continue to do just fine.

And, yes, I know my consolidated 100k miles is NOTHING compared to what others have done with their Goldwings.