Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: New VFR800F VS VFR1200  (Read 1437 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online M.Brane

  • Member
  • Posts: 223
  • Motorcycles: '98 RC46, '97 RC36, '94 RC36, '93 GTS1000
Re: New VFR800F VS VFR1200
« Reply #60 on: May 15, 2014, 11:53:18 PM »
Am I the only person to have owned a VFR 800 and not liked it?  I'm not tyring to be a troll.  But, I am curious if there are VFR owners out there which have owned or taken a long test ride on other ST bikes to compare? 

The ergos, wind management, fit 'n finish, and sound were brilliant.  The suspension was good.  It did well with or without a load of luggage.  But, the VFR felt heavy and lacked power.  And, God forbid, you get in the twisties and V-tech kicked in and out.   :o

Given the VFR's competition, back in the day, I would have rated the ST3 #1, the Sprint ST #2, and the VFR #3. 

I've not ridden a VFR1200.  I'd love to.  If it had better distance capcity and slightly larger hard cases, I may have owned one by now.

 You need to try a real GDC VFR not a V-TEC or 1200 pretender. You'll probably still think it's underpowered if you don't downshift, but I bet you'll still have plenty of fun.

Online chornbe

  • Member
  • Posts: 1154
  • Burdened with glorious purpose.
    • The Pace Motorcycle Podcast
  • Motorcycles: Slowing down
Re: New VFR800F VS VFR1200
« Reply #61 on: May 16, 2014, 08:10:43 AM »
Meh. Liz owned one of the VFR 800, non vtec. It was okay. Power delivery was fine. Plenty of it. But I never gelled with the bike, I certainly didn't fall in love with it, & I truly do not understand all the rabid fans of the VFR overall. The only one I ever truly enjoyed riding, a 1999, had two thousand dollars worth of suspension work done to it
this signature on hold pending review

Online chornbe

  • Member
  • Posts: 1154
  • Burdened with glorious purpose.
    • The Pace Motorcycle Podcast
  • Motorcycles: Slowing down
Re: New VFR800F VS VFR1200
« Reply #62 on: May 16, 2014, 08:12:09 AM »
I will say almost every VFR I've had thru my garage has been owned by a laundry list of people. They do change hands a lot. That's probably some kind of indicator.
this signature on hold pending review

Offline motormike

  • Member
  • Posts: 437
  • Motorcycles: 2007 VFR800 ABS, 2001 VFR800
Re: New VFR800F VS VFR1200
« Reply #63 on: May 16, 2014, 09:25:07 AM »
I will say almost every VFR I've had thru my garage has been owned by a laundry list of people. They do change hands a lot. That's probably some kind of indicator.

If you've owned more than one VFR, why did you sell it and buy another?


The VFR weight and power puts smiles on my face.  I had a lighter SV650s but I prefer the weight of the VFR as it feels more planted and stable.

Online M.Brane

  • Member
  • Posts: 223
  • Motorcycles: '98 RC46, '97 RC36, '94 RC36, '93 GTS1000
Re: New VFR800F VS VFR1200
« Reply #64 on: May 16, 2014, 09:53:33 AM »
Meh. Liz owned one of the VFR 800, non vtec. It was okay. Power delivery was fine. Plenty of it. But I never gelled with the bike, I certainly didn't fall in love with it, & I truly do not understand all the rabid fans of the VFR overall. The only one I ever truly enjoyed riding, a 1999, had two thousand dollars worth of suspension work done to it

 I am the 3rd owner of my 98, and I've put twice as many miles on it as the 2 POs combined. The 94 I just bought has 127K on it. PO only had it a few months, and didn't want to sell it. Somebody must have liked riding it. I know I do.

 Yeah my 98 has $2K of suspension on it. Makes it the bike it should have been all along. I'll ride it till I can't ride it anymore.

 Yeah I'm a GDC VFR zealot.

Online chornbe

  • Member
  • Posts: 1154
  • Burdened with glorious purpose.
    • The Pace Motorcycle Podcast
  • Motorcycles: Slowing down
Re: New VFR800F VS VFR1200
« Reply #65 on: May 16, 2014, 10:11:13 AM »
I did not buy several. Liz owned one. I have worked on many of them. I have ridden many of them that belong to friends. I had one in my garage as a loaner for a couple months. But I've never actually bought one. In fact the loaner was the one that convinced me I didn't want to buy one. All I'm saying is it's just not a bike for everybody. There's a reason they didn't sell in great numbers, and the people who love them, love them. The people don't, don't. There are very few people in the middle ground on the VFR.
this signature on hold pending review

Online 2RR2NV

  • Member
  • Posts: 202
  • if you're gonna go, go with a smile!!
  • Motorcycles: 2012 ZX-14R "the Flaming Hulk"
Re: New VFR800F VS VFR1200
« Reply #66 on: May 16, 2014, 04:01:27 PM »
I miss my VFR. I kick myself for selling it. Now that I have the Zex, I know the VFR can't compare in a lot of areas. I still miss it though. It gelled with me quite well. Until i found out what power was (bought the Busa while still owning the VFR) and got spoiled. that was the only issue. I would still like to buy another. Not new, mind you. I never had probs with the VTEC. I realized it didn't do much to help the bike, but whenever it kicked in, I always smiled like a lil kid. Many a time I did it on purpose just to hear it.
previous rides: 2011 GSXR750, 2007 FJR1300, 2004 GSXR750, 2002 Busa, 2002 VFR800, 1992 Honda Nighthawk CB750