Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock  (Read 601 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online kneescrubber

  • Member
  • Posts: 2628
  • Steak & eggs please
  • Motorcycles: 1999 VFR, 1971 BMW /5
Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« on: May 19, 2014, 07:30:17 AM »
Anyone out there with experience using both? Any advantages or drawbacks of one over the other?
Resident luddite

"West is the best for riding"
RDoug

Online SLK50

  • Member
  • Posts: 81
  • Your life is what you make it.
  • Motorcycles: FJR1300, C-10
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #1 on: May 19, 2014, 07:45:15 AM »
I see no disadvantage to a throttle lock.
Even my bikes with cruise control have one.

Sometimes you just have to give your hand a break.
It's never too early to plan.
It's never too late to go.

Online garry

  • Member
  • Posts: 140
  • Old and In The Way
    • MotoRoads
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2014, 09:18:06 AM »
Never used a throttle lock, but a cramp buster has been a real help on relieving right hand/arm fatiuge on long days. If I did long sections of slab I bet the lock would be the better option, but I try to spend my day in the twisties where it's hours of roll off, roll on, repeat...
2007 KTM 950 SMR
2009 KTM 530 EXC

Online Max Wedge

  • Member
  • Posts: 1050
  • Engineering Pathologist
  • Motorcycles: '10 R1200GS
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #3 on: May 19, 2014, 09:39:30 AM »
Have had both, much prefer the throttle lock. The lock allows you take your hand off the throttle, flex it, trail it in the breeze, shake out a cramp, etc. Crampbuster allows you to loosen your grip. Throttle lock can be adjusted to still return, but allow less force and less grip to maintain throttle opening. Crampbuster still needs to be held steady to modulate speed. Throttle lock will need adjustments constantly unless the road is really flat. Crampbuster needs to rolled out of the way to not be in use, and is awkward to put in that position. Throttle lock can be disengaged easily-depending on style. I have the Kaoko lock, which I like because the lock/unlock feature works the same rotation as the throttle, i.e. rolling off throttle eases the lock feature, but not necessarily enough to completely disengage it.
You never see a motorcycle parked outside a psychiatrists' office.

Online HipGnosis

  • Member
  • Posts: 213
  • It's Hip, ya know
  • Motorcycles: VStar950, Ninja 650
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #4 on: May 19, 2014, 09:57:30 AM »
My BMW K12RS had a Throttlemeister when I got it (and Throttlemeister is close to my house!).
I never got the hang of engaging it smoothly - but I didn't try very hard because I have a crampbuster (or competitor) and put that on the bike.
I sanded down the brand name on the cramp buster because it annoyed me that I could feel it thru my summer gloves.
I have taken a moment here to rest, to steal a view of the glorious vista that surrounds me, to look back on the distance I have come. But I can only rest for a moment, for with freedom come responsibilities, and I dare not linger
― Nelson Mandela

Online Cablebandit

  • Member
  • Posts: 1824
  • Pig Pilot
    • https://www.facebook.com/TheCablebandits
  • Motorcycles: A Blue One
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2014, 02:42:01 PM »
I find that that Crampbuster always seemed to be in the way.  As a matter of fact i think it's in the way on my workbench right now. 

Let me know if you want it.


Online squeezer

  • Member
  • Posts: 357
  • squirrelly geezer
  • Motorcycles: 03 FJR
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #6 on: May 19, 2014, 02:47:22 PM »
I find that that Crampbuster always seemed to be in the way.  As a matter of fact i think it's in the way on my workbench right now. 

Let me know if you want it.

I'm with Chris -- I liked the Crampbuster and used it to get across the continent once, but the throttle locks are easier on long slab hauls and that's what I need it for. I gave my Crampbuster away.


For throttle locks, I've tried both the Vista Cruise style and the Throttlemeister. I like the Throttlemeister better but I think that's a minority opinion.

Offline Dan K

  • Member
  • Posts: 330
  • Motorcycles: '06 Triumph Sprint 1050 ST ABS and '03 Aprilia Tuoldo
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #7 on: May 19, 2014, 02:48:11 PM »
Have had both, much prefer the throttle lock. The lock allows you take your hand off the throttle, flex it, trail it in the breeze, shake out a cramp, etc. Crampbuster allows you to loosen your grip. Throttle lock can be adjusted to still return, but allow less force and less grip to maintain throttle opening. Crampbuster still needs to be held steady to modulate speed. Throttle lock will need adjustments constantly unless the road is really flat. Crampbuster needs to rolled out of the way to not be in use, and is awkward to put in that position. Throttle lock can be disengaged easily-depending on style. I have the Kaoko lock, which I like because the lock/unlock feature works the same rotation as the throttle, i.e. rolling off throttle eases the lock feature, but not necessarily enough to completely disengage it.


I have a cramp buster and a clamp type lever throttle lock that by tension rests against the brake lever to keep throttle engaged.

It's nice to have your hands free on long rides for a moment or two to adjust helmet, zippers, stretch a second, what not. Mine is one of these...go cruise.  Disengage by rolling off the throttle. Simple.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


www.webbikeworld.com/t2/go-cruise-throttle-control

Only problem is it is NOT a cruise control - if you head up a hill, your bike will lose speed. Downhill? It will speed up. But it's worth it for the quick right hand free moment often needed on a long ride.

-Dan

EDIT - I do like my cramp buster. It is never in the way - it rotates with the throttle. It hasn't been off my Sprint in at least two years.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2014, 09:50:45 AM by Dan K »
Sometimes, the only answer is defenstration.

Online sleazy rider

  • Member
  • Posts: 324
  • Motorcycles: Two in the garage again
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #8 on: May 19, 2014, 05:55:28 PM »
I run both.  The crampbuster is good for on and off the throttle in traffic to ease wrist strain, but the throttlemeister is good for the long haul.

Online kneescrubber

  • Member
  • Posts: 2628
  • Steak & eggs please
  • Motorcycles: 1999 VFR, 1971 BMW /5
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #9 on: May 19, 2014, 06:19:41 PM »
I pretty much got the answers I thought I would. I'm not looking for a cruise control. But 10 years after my right wrist was shattered, I'm having a hard time dealing with long times holding the throttle in a specific position. So when it comes to throttle locks, what works best? I tried a Vistacruise many years ago on my Kbike and was less than expressed.
Resident luddite

"West is the best for riding"
RDoug

Online miles

  • Member
  • Posts: 581
  • Motorcycles: Two of them
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #10 on: May 19, 2014, 06:58:12 PM »
I like the Manic Salamander throttle lock, myself. 

Then you're ripped right out of the ground like a fucking root.  No, you simply cannot hide from the ugly truth.

Online Oddball

  • Member
  • Posts: 78
  • Motorcycles: XS360, DR650, Tiger 800XC, FZ1, R1100RT
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #11 on: May 19, 2014, 06:58:29 PM »
Have both.  Always use the throttle lock.  Camp buster not so much.
IBA# 22015

Offline M.Brane

  • Member
  • Posts: 223
  • Motorcycles: '98 RC46, '97 RC36, '94 RC36, '93 GTS1000
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #12 on: May 19, 2014, 08:05:29 PM »
  I've had Throttlemeisters on two bikes I've owned because they came with the bike, and found them to be fairly useless for me.

  I've bought 3 Cramp Busters, and won't take a long trip without one.

Online Max Wedge

  • Member
  • Posts: 1050
  • Engineering Pathologist
  • Motorcycles: '10 R1200GS
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #13 on: May 20, 2014, 08:32:50 AM »
I pretty much got the answers I thought I would. I'm not looking for a cruise control. But 10 years after my right wrist was shattered, I'm having a hard time dealing with long times holding the throttle in a specific position. So when it comes to throttle locks, what works best? I tried a Vistacruise many years ago on my Kbike and was less than expressed.

Check out how they all operate and get the one you like. I like Kaoko because you can use it to only partially hold the throttle. It is not a full on or full off. It acts like a spring assist, when you let go, it slowly returns, and take just a slight pressure (like just resting your hand on it) to keep the position.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2014, 08:37:57 PM by Max Wedge »
You never see a motorcycle parked outside a psychiatrists' office.

Offline Leanintree

  • Member
  • Posts: 55
  • Bah. This year bites.
  • Motorcycles: yes
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #14 on: May 20, 2014, 03:23:02 PM »
I've had a Throttlemeister for a while, and never been happy with it. Either it was too tight, or not tight enough. Best combo I used was a Go Cruise and the Throttlemeister for long term hands off throttle.

Crampbuster was awesome in it's own way though... Damage to my right elbow has limited my time in saddle without something to help support my wrist, and CB is a godsend.

Go Cruise has also come out with a new unit, metal rather than plastic that I HAVE to have. In fact, I think I will buy it right now. 
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

LT
Blargh.

Online dm_gsx1300r

  • Member
  • Posts: 658
  • Weirdo Freak
  • Motorcycles: 2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2014, 07:59:37 AM »
It depends on the bike too. I tried a crampbuster but the 'busa has such a short throw that it proved to be useless and even a bit annoying. I also tried the rubber grommet on the edge of the throttle between it and the bar end. It generally worked but it wouldn't always keep the throttle in position, especially when colder. I finally got the Throttlemeister and it works just perfectly for me. I keep a couple of fingers on the throttle and use my little/ring finger to tighten it, once friction is in place, I just reach over and finish tightening it down. It does take a little practice to get it going but even when new to it, you can pull in on the clutch and coast, then just take your hand off the throttle, tighten it down and roll back on again.

Carl
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 No matter where you go, there you are.

Offline redbandit14

  • Member
  • Posts: 39
  • Motorcycles: 2001 Suzuki Bandit 1200S
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #16 on: May 26, 2014, 08:11:33 AM »
I've had both but have nothing at the moment , The Cramp buster was in the way and useless on anything but the slab. The throttle lock was good but with my OEM bars was in the way and giving me cramps as much as helping to relieve them.

I'm getting a Go Cruise on the recommendation of my Nephew who has one on his sprint.

Online kneescrubber

  • Member
  • Posts: 2628
  • Steak & eggs please
  • Motorcycles: 1999 VFR, 1971 BMW /5
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #17 on: May 26, 2014, 09:40:37 AM »
Has anyone done any comparisons between Throttlemeister and Kaoko? I've narrowed it down between these 2. Throttlemeister has been around for a long time. The Kaoko unit appears to be a little easier to set because of the knurled ring on the outside.
Resident luddite

"West is the best for riding"
RDoug

Online CLAY

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 1219
  • How did I become a moderator?
  • Motorcycles: '03 Bandit 1200S, '97 XR650L, '79 XS650 Tracker, '75 XS650 Standard
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #18 on: May 26, 2014, 07:52:55 PM »
I've been using the Universal Vista Cruise on the Bandit since I have had it- for me it is perfect.  No experience with the others though. 
http://www.bikebandit.com/universal-vista-cruise?b=15601&utm_source=feed&utm_medium=merchantfeed&utm_campaign=pla&gclid=CNns9Mjxyr4CFdSMMgod0G4A3g
"Most accidents happen when the meek meet the douchebags."  -Viffergyrl

Online dm_gsx1300r

  • Member
  • Posts: 658
  • Weirdo Freak
  • Motorcycles: 2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #19 on: May 27, 2014, 06:55:17 AM »
Has anyone done any comparisons between Throttlemeister and Kaoko? I've narrowed it down between these 2. Throttlemeister has been around for a long time. The Kaoko unit appears to be a little easier to set because of the knurled ring on the outside.

Looks like the Kaoko is about half the price of my Throttlemeister although I don't know what the shipping rate is from South Africa :)  The tech appears to be the same. Turning the bar end causes an internal ring to seat with the throttle face producing friction and preventing the throttle from returning to position.

Mine does look like a bar end though vs the Kaoko and Throttlemeister offers a heavier replacement to reduce vibration (that's the one I bought for a few bucks more).

The Kaoko does have a larger grabbing area which would make it easy to apply. I personally get the bike up to the appropriate speed and then push my thumb against the throttle to hold it in place and use my little finger to roll it into place. Works every time and with Gerbing gloves or my normal deerskin riding gloves (rode up to Devil's Tower over the weekend so I used it a bit both ways :) ).

It would appear to be that it depends on the look you're trying to achieve. The Kaoko has just the one style; black. The Throttlemeister folks seem to offer several different styles.

Carl
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 No matter where you go, there you are.

Online kneescrubber

  • Member
  • Posts: 2628
  • Steak & eggs please
  • Motorcycles: 1999 VFR, 1971 BMW /5
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #20 on: May 31, 2014, 09:42:23 PM »
Ordered a Crampbuster today. <$14 shipped. Turns out the Kaoko doesn't make 1 for my VFR and every place I found for the Throttlemeister was 7-10 days for shipping.   :rolf:    :csm:
Resident luddite

"West is the best for riding"
RDoug

Online Cablebandit

  • Member
  • Posts: 1824
  • Pig Pilot
    • https://www.facebook.com/TheCablebandits
  • Motorcycles: A Blue One
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #21 on: June 01, 2014, 06:34:32 PM »
Should have waited until Clay-B-Que.  I would have brought you one.

Online kneescrubber

  • Member
  • Posts: 2628
  • Steak & eggs please
  • Motorcycles: 1999 VFR, 1971 BMW /5
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #22 on: June 01, 2014, 06:45:46 PM »
Thanks.

I think.

Resident luddite

"West is the best for riding"
RDoug

Offline BillL

  • Member
  • Posts: 3
  • Motorcycles: 1982 CB900F, 2013 Multistrada
Re: Cramp buster vs full blown throttle lock
« Reply #23 on: July 21, 2014, 09:25:41 AM »
I put the VistaCruise on my old 900 a long, long time ago.  It works, but that's all I'll say.  My Blackbird came with a ThrottleMeister from the previous owner.  I loved it.  Nicer "grip" on the throttle than the VistaCruise.  Beautiful pieces of machined metal.  I've got one coming for the Duc.  Hopefully, I will get it installed without difficulty.